Can it be true?
Is it really possible that the story and experience of UFO abduction, which had this country so mesmerized back in the 90s, is a remembrance/re-enactment of the African American historical trauma? Mediated through the harrowing experience of the world’s first abductee, the African American Barney Hill?
There are no reliable statistics on how many people have experienced–or remembered, or reported–UFO abductions. The number is surely in the thousands. And if the theory I set out in my last post is correct, we’d surely expect African Americans to account for a large chunk of them.
They don’t.
I don’t want to say there haven’t been any black abductees since Barney Hill. But their number is vanishingly small. UFO abduction is an overwhelmingly Caucasian phenomenon. The pattern set in the granddaddy-abduction, of black man and white woman taken together aboard the spaceship, has to my knowledge never repeated itself.
And that’s not the only problem my theory faces. We still have to explain just how the experience of enslavement, centuries ago, might become part of the unconscious of a black man born in 1922. Thence to be liberated or unleashed by the hypnotic skills of Dr. Benjamin Simon. After all, it’s not as if traumatic events leave their mark on the genes.
Or do they?
When I gave a reading from my book at the Catawba County Library last month, and spoke in the question-and-answer period about the Hill abduction, Tammy Wilson called my attention to a 2007 “Nova” program entitled, appropriately, “Ghost in Your Genes.” Suggestive evidence that sufferings endured by the grandparents’ generation–specifically, recurrent famine in an isolated Swedish village–might shape the life expectancy of grandchildren who’d never known a hungry day.
And there are other, non-genetic ways trauma can be conveyed from one generation to the next. Psychologists who work with the children of Holocaust survivors are familiar with this. The parents spare the children the grisly details of what they’ve endured in the death camps. But somehow–through gesture, through recurrent act–the experience is transmitted, wordlessly, to replay itself in those who’d never suffered it. “The second generation absorbs the unvocalized deep memory from the parent,” says Israeli psychotherapist Dina Wardi (quoted by Daan van Kampenhout). “The real stuff is never transmitted through words.”
So the problem, of how Barney Hill inherited the trauma of the slave ships, is deeply mysterious–especially given the long time gap–but not insoluble. It’s the other difficulty that really troubles me.
Why is it the offspring of the perpetrators (or beneficiaries) of African slavery who’ve re-enacted, with ever-growing accumulation of bizarre and often blatantly sexual detail, a pain neither they nor their forerunners ever endured?
Is it possible that in a great historic crime–like the Holocaust, like slavery–the deep psyches of perpetrator and victim become entwined, enmeshed, bonded? (They’re both, in a sense, partners in the crime.) This seems to be the experience of those who’ve worked with the “Family Constellations” therapy pioneered by Bert Hellinger, and sometimes used for the joint therapy of the children of Nazis and of survivors. My own thoughts on this subject have been influenced by my experiences in a workshop at the Hellinger Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, and by an important book I purchased at that workshop, Daan van Kampenhout’s The Tears of the Ancestors: Victims and Perpetrators in the Tribal Soul (2008). I’m not ready to buy the whole Hellinger “package” of psychological theory–he and his followers often seem to me a great deal too sure of themselves, given the uncertainty of the evidence. But that they’re on to something about the deepest layer of our souls, I came away without the slightest doubt.
So I think it’s possible: the perpetrators and their heirs (whether genetic or cultural) can unconsciously experience what they once inflicted on others.
We mustn’t forget–if Barney was the world’s first abductee, as I called him, he wasn’t alone. His wife Betty was in the alien ship with him.
It’s even possible that, as some UFO skeptics have claimed, it was Betty who did the lion’s share of shaping what became their joint account of abduction, through dreams she began having a few days after their eerie experience in the New Hampshire mountains. But if it was Betty who created the abduction narrative, it was Barney who felt it. “When Dr. Simon played the recording of Betty reliving under regressive hypnosis what should have been the terrifying experience of being taken aboard the alien craft–not knowing if she and Barney might be dissected like frogs–her voice was as calm as if she were describing a trip to the local supermarket.” So says Phil Klass–with, I imagine, a bit of a sneer. But if Betty’s lack of affect is proof for Klass of the unreality of the abduction, surely Barney’s super-affect ought to be proof it was in some sense real!
(“As I listened to Barney reliving his UFO encounter, I could agree completely with the doctor that Barney had indeed seen ‘something,’ and it had been a terrifying experience.” That’s also Klass–and what an admission! I wish Klass were still alive, so I could ask him what, in his opinion, that “something” was.)
Child of the slave, child of the slaver–collaborators in the re-enactment (soon to be replicated thousands of times over) of the ancestral crime. What became of them both?
Betty lived to a ripe old age, the great lady of UFO abductions, passing away only in 2004. Not so Barney. He died of a cerebral hemorrhage on February 25, 1969–five years, almost to the day, after the hypnotic regression that first exposed him to the literally unspeakable enormity of what he’d carried inside him.
He was 46 years old.
These are difficult problems, their threads leading down into the deep complexities of the human soul. Please help me think them through. Post your comments here or at my Fan Page, www.facebook.com/JournalofaUFOInvestigator.
Martin Kottmeyer says
Dear David Halperin,
I feel obliged to bring to your attention some observations. You speak of Barney’s cup over the groin as in some sense being a ‘castration.’ You seem unaware that in Webb’s original report of the case – understandably withheld by Fuller in The Interrupted Journey – the scene was described in these terms:
“He felt a cup-like device placed around his genitals and believed a sperm specimen was somehow withdrawn. His left arm was scraped for skin cells, and his ears and throat were checked. He was rolled over on his stomach. A cylindrical object was inserted up his rectum, and once again the witness believed something was extracted.”
It has been pointed out that this is plausibly based on the procedure of electro-ejaculation where a probe is inserted the backside, the organism is zapped, and sperm forcibly expelled. Barney lived on a farm when he was young and could easily have witnessed this done by veterinarians. In this context it is worth noting that Nation of Islam mythology held that the white race resulted from a deliberate eugenic attempt to breed the black genes out of humans by a mad scientist named Yacub (Jacob). The process took about 600 years and was centered on the Island of Patmos. A means for the bringing about the fall of America and the doom of the white race was a vehicle of their salvation called the Mother Plane, which was linked to the biblical flying wheel of the prophet Ezekiel. The whites were intended to create a hell on earth for the blacks. A Mother Plane would roll back the dominance of the whites. As Barney was married to a white woman he could implicitly be regarded as a traitor to his race by such beings. The acquisition of Barney’s sperm might also tie into the eugenic mission of the Mother Plane.
The needle in the navel you infer was a way of killing off half-breed offspring. But the dream in fact refers to it as a pregnancy test and it is worth noting that in that era it was not uncommon to draw off amniotic fluid for rh factor testing by a needle through the abdomen. The real issue though was that Betty was deeply fearful of having been exposed to radiation from the saucer based on a test of certain marks on the car using a compass. The test was nonsense, but Betty did not know that at the time. The ability of radiation to create mutation and deformities was well-known from Hiroshima and nuclear test fallout studies. If you’ve just been exposed to radiation, testing for pregnancy was a reasonable thing to do.
The possibilities are many; I offer this as just speculation more closely tied to the concerns of the era.
Martin Kottmeyer
David says
Thank you so much for your detailed and informative comment!
As you surmise, I wasn’t aware of this detail from Webb’s report, and am grateful to you for bringing it to my attention. If Barney imagined himself turned into a farm animal on the UFO, that would seem to me to fit in with the idea he was reliving the experience of slavery. Part of the horror of slavery was just that: human beings were made into farm animals.
Do we know whether Barney had any connection, positive or negative, with the Nation of Islam?
A friend of mine has called my attention to the role of UFO-patterned myth in the life of the jazz musician Sun Ra. (He pointed me toward the Wikipedia article.) Which leads me to wonder: what do we know about UFOs in African-American culture? I have the sense there’s a white UFOlogy and a black UFOlogy in this country, that overlap but are not the same. Have you ever looked into this?
Thanks again for posting.
David