We were going to call our book The Flying Saucer Mystery. This was 57 years ago, when I’d just turned 13, and my pal Bryan and I were fired up with the idea that two bright eighth-graders like us could write the definitive book on the “elusive disks,” as one writer called them. Heck, we could figure out what made the saucers fly and build our own! Maybe then girls would go out with us.
We never wrote our book. We never built our UFO. Slowly we discovered other, easier ways to get dates. Bryan lost interest in the whole subject and, as friends, we drifted apart. I became more and more immersed in UFOlogy.
In my junior year in high school I was director of an international research organization–it had 20 or 30 members, but they were all over the country and one or two in Great Britain–called the “New Jersey Association on Aerial Phenomena.” I’d contributed the introduction and large chunks of the contents to a book called The Shadow of the Unknown, published in 1963. The book was run off on a mimeograph machine and looked hideous, but it garnered praise from the British Flying Saucer Review, a glossy magazine that we 1960s UFOlogists regarded as the pinnacle of class. “The whole field of the UFO mystery is very competently surveyed by a number of contributors,” said the Flying Saucer Review reviewer. I couldn’t have been prouder.
This wasn’t the book I had dreamed of writing, but for the next 50 years it would have to do.
I went off to college. I gave up on the possibility of ever solving the UFO mystery; it was hopeless, and there was too much else that called to me. My belief in UFOs faded, very slowly. There wasn’t any one morning when I woke up and realized it wasn’t true, we weren’t being visited from outer space. It took a while for that reality to sink in.
I never lost the sense that somewhere in my teenage intuition there was a real and vital truth. There was indeed something important about UFOs, not for understanding the vast and empty skies but for knowing ourselves–as individuals, as a culture, as a species. I became a professor of religious studies, with Judaica as my field of expertise. My special interest: religious traditions of heavenly ascent and otherworldly journeys.
I’d never stopped being a UFOlogist, it turned out. I’d just found a different way to do it.
And now I’m writing the book I always wanted to write. It’s called Intimate Alien: The Hidden Story of the UFO. I’ve just signed on to publish it with Stanford University Press. We’re not sure when it’ll be out and available, but sometime in 2020 is our best estimate.
Of course it’s very different from the book I would have written at age 13. A lifetime of study and reflection has come in between. Most books on UFOs, I write in the introduction, “try to make a case for UFOs’ physical existence”–as I once would have–“as visitors from other planets or possibly other dimensions. A much smaller but still substantial chunk of literature argues that they’re a sustained absurdity, a mishmash of honest human mistakes compounded by dishonest ones. Those are the two main currents of thought on the subject: the ‘believers’ and the ‘debunkers.’ …
“I don’t believe, nor do I debunk. This book will advocate for a third way.”
Readers of this blog will have gotten many glimpses of that “third way.” Again to quote my introduction: “This trail of ours is a wandering and idiosyncratic path. It will lead us on detours from the post-World War II UFO phenomenon to remote times, places, and events. The ships of the Atlantic slave trade … the moon over the Dardanelles one July evening in 1683 … back to Paul in the New Testament and Ezekiel in the Old, and far, far back to the prehistoric Balkans. Our road will terminate in 1947 in Roswell, New Mexico, the place from which—speaking symbolically, not historically—the UFOs have their beginning. Perhaps also their end.”
Why does Stanford University Press want to publish a book like this? The answer in one word: religion.
Not the familiar sneer of the debunkers, that UFOs are “a religious cult.” They aren’t a cult; they never have been. Call them instead a religious phenomenon: a UFO encounter as a genuine religious experience, the lore of UFOlogy as a true religious myth. Not understanding “myth” in the put-down sense of something untrue, but as Carl Jung used it, to designate a sort of collective dream–uncanny, transcendent, timeless. (“When a myth takes visible form,” I write, “when it’s projected into the sky as a flying disk … that’s a major event, akin to what our ancestors might have called a vision of God.”)
My editor at Stanford University Press is Emily-Jane Cohen. She’s Executive Editor in Literature, Philosophy, and Religion, a Ph.D. in literature who’s been a scholar of early and medieval Christianity, a teacher at all levels from elementary school to college. It was her vision that brought into being a book series called “Spiritual Phenomena,” which (to quote the description on the SUP website) “features investigations of events, experiences, and objects, both unusual and everyday, that people characterize as spiritual, paranormal, magical, occult and/or supernatural.”
Which naturally covers UFOs, along with other things (like parapsychology and spiritualism) that we don’t normally package in the box labeled “Religion.” But Emily-Jane is used to thinking outside that box. That’s what she brings to her work with the religious-studies offerings of Stanford University Press.
Emily-Jane’s vision is shared by the “Spiritual Phenomena” series editors, Tanya Luhrmann and Ann Taves–two distinguished scholars of religion, professors at Stanford and the University of California at Santa Barbara respectively. Luhrmann is the author of the 2012 bestseller When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God.
A post on the Press’s blog, devoted to Emily-Jane and her projects, comments: “Celebrity atheists, in the style of Dawkins or Hitchens, who fabricate all-or-nothing dichotomies that pit religious knowledge against science and reason, do themselves a disservice by checking out of important conversations. By denouncing or ignoring how people engage with the world on religious and spiritual levels, ‘you shut yourself down to understanding other cultures,’ says Cohen.”
Not to mention: unrecognized or despised dimensions of our own culture. Like UFOs.
Those “important conversations” can be conducted in a range of idioms. Many of the “Spiritual Phenomena” offerings will be scholarly monographs, written in academic style. Others, like Intimate Alien, are trade books intended for a broad audience. We’re all talking about the same thing: phenomena that are religious to the core yet don’t bear the stamp of any orthodox or institutional religion. Phenomena that are indisputably real in and of themselves, even when they relate to entities that in all likelihood don’t exist.
We’re all struggling to make sense of what these phenomena are, and what they mean for us as human beings.
I’m honored to be part of this team. I’m thrilled finally to be writing the book I’ve needed to write for more than half a century.
At age 13, or even 30, I couldn’t have written Intimate Alien. At age 70, I think I just may be able to pull it off. I couldn’t be more excited.
by David Halperin
Learn more about David Halperin on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/davidjhalperin
Connect to Journal of a UFO Investigator on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/JournalofaUFOInvestigator
and Find David Halperin on Google+
Don’t have time to keep checking my blog? Sign up for my monthly email newsletter, with summaries and links to the past month’s posts, plus oldies-but-goodies from the archive.
Lance Freedlund says
Very interesting. At 60 I’m in a similar age bracket and now am convinced we’re somehow visited, even though I’m also a fan of scientists like DeGrasse Tyson. I say ‘somehow’ being visited, because I’m convinced the methods being used to get here, from wherever they come, are way beyond current technology, and beyond our *ability* to understand. They don’t get in a rocket ship and blast off from another planet. There’s an entire world of physics being used here we haven’t begun to guess at. Quantum physics research perhaps is beginning to glimpse this world, another complete version of reality than the one we exist in. Grasping this reality may take thousands of years. Perhaps their travel involves bending and warping of dimensions and space-time, using unimaginable energy…we can’t know. It’s wrong for the scientific community to keep dismissing the thousands of personal accounts as nothing but misinterpretations or hoaxes.
David Halperin says
Thanks for posting, Lance!
mike says
I certainly look forward to your work, and I expect this will be a welcomed read for many seriously interested in this subject.
We’re the same age, and I was a Ripley’s Believe it or Not, Strange as it Seems, Sci Fi movies and Charles Fort’s books fan at 13 when a friend’s uncle who was an Air Force jet pilot gave me 2 books on ‘UFOs’ – one by Major Keyhoe ( which I didn’t find convincing ) and the other by Capt. Ruppelt . I was seriously trying to figure out what was going on -was it all science fiction or could it be possible ? And I still remember my amazement when it seemed certain that Ruppelt implied it was very real – yet in 2 more short chapters turned it all upside down.
I remained interested until ‘believing’ the Condon report – which put it all to rest .
With a degree in psychology and deep interests in cultural anthropology and mystics I placed these ‘experiences’ somewhere in the realm of Jung’s ideas (as well as I can understand ).
But now , I’m still a Fortean, and most likely there are many answers because there are many phenomena that are all being put into the same bag but simply don’t fit the label fruit or vegetable.
Where do we put the “ Airship mystery” ? They weren’t ‘unidentified’ and clearly humans were the pilots and crews …. my point is that perhaps they were ‘real’ and the same pilots’ sons are flying the ufos of today.
Or wouldn’t it make more sense that ‘robots’ beyond our imagination could be the makers and pilots of ufos ….
Still, I very much welcome you opening the door and throwing light and fresh air on the third way.
Please try to get on Coast 2 Coast !!!
David Halperin says
The Airship mystery … so baffling. What did it mean to the witnesses to encounter these obviously human contraptions?
Thanks so much for posting!
Peggy Payne says
Congratulations, David!
David Halperin says
Thank you, Peggy!
Jordan Hofer says
Hi David,
Looking forward to reading this, possibly the most important book ever written on ufology. I have appreciated your feedback over the last decade. Turns out my own investigation into UFOs hit a brick wall with my last book from Schiffer, entitled Unidentifiable Flying Objects. The basic thesis of my book is that UFOs exist as a phenomenon in nature but we do not know what they are and we most probably never will.
All best,
Jordan Hofer
David Halperin says
Thanks for posting, Jordan! Let me add here the link to your new book: https://www.schifferbooks.com/unidentifiable-flying-objects-the-dwindling-probability-of-solving-the-ufo-enigma-6329.html.
Pierre Charles Dubreuil says
Hi David. I’m sure your new book will be fascinating. I suppose you will include a few words in it about the “Raelian religion” and the encounter experience Claude Vorilhon had on December 13th, 1973. It was certainly a “religious” experience since Vorilhon later discovered that the extraterrestrial he met IS the YHWH of the hebrew bible and from him he learned that all life on earth was scientifically created by the space scientist the bible has named : The Elohim. They ask Vorilhon aka “RAEL” to build an Embassy so they might have an official contact/return with all the prophets of old. This will be the most wonderfull day for humanity !
David Halperin says
Thanks for posting, Pierre Charles! I’m not sure what I will say about the Raelians in my book. I appreciate your input.